Wednesday, March 1, 2017

Three Men Make A Tiger Fallacy

The three men make a tiger fallacy is basically summarized in the idea that if enough people repeat the information, it will be accepted as truth. For example, if one or two people say there is a tiger, a person less likely to believe it. But, if a third men agrees that there is a tiger, then the person will believe that there is in fact a tiger. This fallacy was developed as a proverbs by Pang Kong, who lived during the Warring States period.
The main concept of this fallacy is that implausible situations can be considered as truth, if enough people lie, it will therefore be concluded as truth. With things like fake news being so prominent in today’s society, it has become the modern three men make a tiger fallacy. Politicians and news companies alike tend to bend the facts in order to make them seem better and more reliable.
Second, people’s stories are always changing based on how they remember information. So, three people might have heard the story wrong, but does not mean that it is right. With billions of people on the planet, there is of course going to be some details that are exchanged differently. Therefore, the three tiger fallacy is more prominent in today’s world with the technology available more than ever.


No comments:

Post a Comment