Rhetorical Media and Civic Life
Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy
Paige Osborne
February 18, 2015
The
Texas sharpshooter fallacy is described as, “Ignoring
the difference while focusing on the similarities, thus coming to an inaccurate
conclusion,” (Carroll.) The origins of the Texas sharpshooter fallacy began
from a joke about a Texan gunslinger that pointed his gun at the side of a barn
and shoots several holes into the barn. Afterwards, he walks up to the barn and
points to his bullet holes and reasons that this is the center and his bullets
shot the bullseye. This is proof, he says, that he is a sharp shooter
(Carroll.)
There are many examples of this. If you went to a fortuneteller
and she read your palm, she might tell you that you will meet someone and fall
in love. Hoping for more details, you ask her more about this woman. The
fortuneteller says that she drives a red car, she has brown hair, she works at
a restaurant, and that she loves cats.
Five years later you meet the love of your life. She drives a blue
car, she works for an insurance company, and she has a goldfish. But, she does
have brown hair. He goes back to the fortuneteller demanding his money back.
But the fortuneteller just smiles, “She does have brown hair.” The fortuneteller is pointing to the
one prediction that she made out of many to prove that she named your match.
Her prediction proves the Texas sharpshooter fallacy because she is pointing to
one point out of many to say she can tell the future, when really she was just
guessing, and there is no proof that she can tell the future.
Basically, the
Texas sharpshooter fallacy is pointing to the exception in a cluster of
statements to prove a point. Another definition is, “inserting meaning into
randomness,” (Carroll.)
These examples are
somewhat silly without any harm coming to either party. In reality, it can be
much more difficult to prove a fallacy from the truth. In 1999, Atul Gawande
wrote an article for the New Yorker
that centered on burgeoning clusters of cancer cases without a reason as to why
these cases could be happening (Gawande.) Scientists were unable to find any
scientific reason, and citizens in these clusters were stumped and were
determined to find a cause to fit the pattern of cancer cases in their area. It’s
true that the cluster is there, but constructing a reason to fit the pattern is
the Texas sharpshooter fallacy.
Works
Cited
Carroll, R. (2003). The Texas Sharp Shooter Fallacy. In The
skeptic's dictionary: A collection of strange beliefs, amusing deceptions, and
dangerous delusions (1st ed., Vol. 1, p. 23). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Gawande, A. (2004, April 3). The Cancer-Cluster Myth.
Retrieved February 19, 2015, from
http://www.astswmo.org/Files/Meetings/2008/2008-Annual_Meeting/Presentations/Federal
Facilities/CancerClusterGawand.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment