By: Geoffrey Ledbetter
If
you’re human*, it’s likely you’ve encountered this situation before: You’re
having a social interaction with someone, and suddenly the conversation trails off
and you are left standing around awkwardly, unsure of how to proceed. Quick!
What do you do? Pull the old "what in the world can that be?!" trick
and disappear? Pull a Fred Flinstone and "yabba dabba doo" right
outta there? Or, more probably, do you instead pull out your phone and
pretend you have just received a text message that requires your immediate
attention? Yes, in this day and age, the phone has become the all-purpose tool
for escaping even the slightest possibility of social awkwardness. Today,
individuals stare intently into their screens, insulating themselves in their own little worlds as they sit in class, wait for
appointments, or ride public transportation. Indeed, these miraculous devices
seem to grant them "awkward moment insurance" and allow
them to avoid the mere possibility they might be left in a lurch and lost in a
search for the words to say. Now, as Héctor Carral rightly says in his defense
of social media technologies, smartphones are not destroying society or ruining
our lives. However, the ubiquitous presence of smartphones does seem to promote
acts of civil inattention by preventing possible interactions that could lead
to lasting and meaningful social relationships. Those tiny little awkward
moments are part of being human, and the ability to successfully navigate them
by continuing the conversation or changing the subject is a skill that can only
be cultivated through experience. (I admit, I don’t guarantee this last bit.
I’m still plenty awkward in social situations, and I’ve been through tons
of them. Still, in theory…)
One
of the main premises of Carral’s argument is that smartphones are instruments
for communication, and this is indeed true. However, the question must be asked: Are people really using
their devices to communicate with other, long-distance partners, or are they
using them to scroll through Buzzfeed lists, Pinterest menus, or online
shopping sites? An average glance around me on any given day in a lecture class
instills a sincere skepticism that people are truly using their smartphones for
meaningful social interactions. Rather than being used as a medium of communication, smartphones are frequently employed as a distraction from the
mundane and a protection from the awkward.
Dear Mr. Carral, please stop using this photo to suggest reading newspapers is the same as using smartphones to avoid social interactions. Newspapers are not smartphones. |
Carral further argues that there is
nothing wrong with creating a permanent memento of experiences by documenting
them with their smartphones, which I might be able to concede. However, issues
arise when people start to experience the world purely through their
screens. When people become so invested in documenting their lives by filming
the concerts they’re attending or photographing the mountain vistas they are
observing, they frequently do so at the expense of simply experiencing life.
(Don’t take my word that this is bad. Esteemed social commentator and cultural
critic Louis CK agrees!)
In essence, while smartphones are not
destroying society, they significantly impact our interactions with strangers
and allow us to cocoon ourselves in our own little social worlds. The
solutions, it seems, are rather simple: Talk to that person sitting next to you
on the bus. Take a moment to simply take in the world rather than Instagramming
it. Evaluate your intentions for absentmindedly scrolling through social media. Don’t be a
Glasshole™ Smartphone responsibly.
Speaking of Glassholes...
(Fast forward to 2:01 for real commentary on the implications of Google Glass on social interactions.)
(Fast forward to 2:01 for real commentary on the implications of Google Glass on social interactions.)
*If you’re not human, I tip my hat to you for
either having achieved self-awareness (if you are a robot), or for having
mastered the English language (if you are an extraterrestrial). Good job.
No comments:
Post a Comment