Our
memory has evolved over the centuries, and we are finding that us as
individuals remember less, but our technology is remembering more. According to
the article “Failing to Forget the Drunken Pirate”, the capabilities of the
Internet have allowed us to store enormous amounts of data and information on
how we go about our lives. What we
search on the Internet, what we buy, where we’ve been, and what we post are all
stored and can be accessed in the future. Not to mention all of the knowledge
available to us through the Internet. But does all this access to information
affect how we remember things ourselves? A study published in the Yale
Scientific Magazine sought to answer this question by testing how well people
remembered trivia questions when they were told they’d have access to the
answers later, versus not having the answers. Not surprisingly, those who
thought the answers would not be available later remembered the answers better.
Knowing that we have access to the Internet and all of the answers held there,
we do not feel the need to commit things to memory, like people of the past had
to do. The article also brought up the case of students not paying as much
attention in class, or taking good notes if they know the PowerPoint will be
posted online to access later.
Another
experiment was done where the subjects paid more attention to computer related
words after being asked a trivia question, which showed our brains think about
computers when there is a question we do not know how to answer. Even more evidence showing are brains are
geared more towards computers and the internet is when subjects were asked to
remember which folder the answers to trivia facts were saved in, they better
remembered the folder versus the answers to the facts. Dr. Sparrow, who
conducted these experiments, believes the results show that our memory patterns
have changed, but is this change a good thing? Does “externally storing memory”
on computers and other devices affect the way we reason and make decisions, if
we had retained that information instead? We know that too little memory can be
a bad thing, but what about too much memory? According to the “Drunken Pirate”,
there is definitely a negative side to having too much memory. A case was
published about a woman in California who has the ability to remember
everything since she was 11. But because of this ability, it is extremely
difficult for her to make decisions, and she becomes caught up in her memories.
So now we come to the question of what is memory’s happy medium? Perhaps we
need to stop relying on the Internet so much for answers, especially since we
are storing so much more on something that is not physical, like books. Could you
imagine what would happen if our technology, and the Internet no longer worked?
How much precious information would we lose?
http://www.yalescientific.org/2013/05/is-google-ruining-your-memory-the-science-of-memory-in-the-digital-age/
No comments:
Post a Comment