The filter bubble is a comfortable and cozy area of the Internet
where one can feel like they belong because the views and opinions in that
filter bubble are all similar. The voices that fill that filter bubble are
voices of agreement and support, not voices of constructive criticism, nor
voices of disagreement. The problem with the filter bubble is that people are
not being exposed to difficult situations and are not being challenged to
critically analyze and consider different viewpoints and opinions on a variety
of subjects. Websites like Facebook and Google collect data to create
algorithms that determine what a person will see on their Newsfeed and Google
Results. The filter bubble has created a space where dissoi logoi is no longer
required in order to participate in a meaningful conversation in which participants
are able to disagree with one another.
On the
other side of things, people have conversations and arguments all the time
through public Facebook posts, YouTube comments, Tweets, and the like. People
are always calling each other out on little things like grammar to the more
important things such as ideals and beliefs. From what I’ve witnessed on
Facebook, a lot of the time people are tearing each other down for what they
believe or something insignificant they said. Comments are dissected down to a
single word or a single phrase that was used. These dissections of comments may
not be the most constructive way to participate in dissoi logoi, but it is
still beneficial that people are able to partake in constructive conversations.
Although these conversations happen within a personalized filter bubble, people
are still communicating, using rhetoric, and arguing. The content of an
argument within the filter bubble is limited because of the customized
algorithm of the filter bubble; however humans are social creatures and will
interact with others in anyway that they are able.
Social
interaction through the Internet creates a safe environment for people to voice
their opinions and debate different topics. This safe environment becomes even
safer through the filter bubble because the people that are debating often
share similar, if not identical, opinions. The filter bubble decreases the
amount of media that really matters and filters in the posts that will put
people in a good mood rather than putting people in a situation where they
might actually have to use their brain. Humans, although they are social
creatures, are also creatures of comfort. People want to see the funny memes
and the latest weight loss trends and the celebrities that are “just like us”.
These things, while entertaining, are not things of importance to the world.
These entertaining articles are there to distract people from the important
things going on in the world such as the crisis with ISIS, troops being
deployed, people starving and the like. These topics are often on the outside
of most people’s filter bubble because they are difficult subjects to discuss
because they make people uncomfortable. These uncensored posts about difficult
subjects are rich in subject matter for people wishing to participate in
serious discussions.
The filter
bubble creates a safe environment for friendly debate mostly about
insignificant topics. Without the filter bubble the people of the Internet
would be exposed to a wide variety of topics to discuss and analyze and form
opinions on so that they can debate and discuss what is meaningful to them.
No comments:
Post a Comment